Example data. Synthetic demo input, not a customer run.
Illustrative example. The simulation engine did not produce this report.
Sample report
What a finished CrowdProof report looks like
Example written 2026-10-17. The simulation engine did not produce this report, so there is no run date and no engine commit. Fieldnote is fictional. The shares, sentiment, posts, and synthesis below are example figures in this illustration.
Input
The message under test
Fieldnote (a fictional note-taking app) raises its Pro plan from $8 to $12/month.
Simulated people
500
Rounds
20
Platforms
3
Pulse, Forum, Circle
Faction shares
Example split of the simulated crowd. Shares sum to 100%.
- Loyal but annoyed34%
They want a concrete reason to accept the new price. -0.22
- Worth the hike28%
They treat $12 as fine if Pro keeps gaining a specific capability. +0.31
- Ready to leave22%
They talk about exporting notes and opening another app. -0.48
- Still reading16%
They are waiting on billing details the announcement left out. +0.04
Sentiment by round
Example average stance each round, from -1 to +1. The dashed line is zero.
Round-by-round example sentiment: Round 1: -0.06, Round 2: -0.11, Round 3: -0.18, Round 4: -0.22, Round 5: -0.27, Round 6: -0.31, Round 7: -0.36, Round 8: -0.34, Round 9: -0.33, Round 10: -0.30, Round 11: -0.29, Round 12: -0.26, Round 13: -0.24, Round 14: -0.22, Round 15: -0.21, Round 16: -0.20, Round 17: -0.19, Round 18: -0.18, Round 19: -0.18, Round 20: -0.17
- R1 -0.06
- R2 -0.11
- R3 -0.18
- R4 -0.22
- R5 -0.27
- R6 -0.31
- R7 -0.36
- R8 -0.34
- R9 -0.33
- R10 -0.30
- R11 -0.29
- R12 -0.26
- R13 -0.24
- R14 -0.22
- R15 -0.21
- R16 -0.20
- R17 -0.19
- R18 -0.18
- R19 -0.18
- R20 -0.17
Representative posts
5 example posts from simulated people in this illustration.
- @margin_notesPulseR3Loyal but annoyed
Eight dollars was why I stayed on Pro. Twelve dollars needs a feature I can name, not a note about keeping the lights on.
- @index_cardsForumR8Worth the hike
I would keep the offline vault if the next Pro update is specific. Moving three years of notes is the part I want to avoid.
- @desk_stackCircleR12Ready to leave
I am exporting this weekend. A higher Pro price with nothing new in the box is the moment I open the other notebook I already have.
- @draft_hourPulseR16Still reading
Does annual billing stay put? The announcement only talks about the monthly Pro price.
- @field_journalForumR19Loyal but annoyed
I am not moving my archive today. I am also not adding a second seat until someone says what the extra four dollars is for.
Synthesis report
Executive summary
This illustrative example shows a simulated crowd of 500 people across 20 rounds on Pulse, Forum, and Circle, reacting to a fictional price change: Fieldnote Pro moving from $8 to $12 a month. The example splits into four camps. The largest camp asks what the extra four dollars pays for. Another camp treats the new price as acceptable when Pro gains a specific capability. A third camp talks about exporting notes and leaving. A fourth camp asks about annual billing, which the announcement does not mention.
Insights
- Example posts keep returning to what the extra four dollars pays for. The announcement names the new price and does not name a new capability.
- Leaving talk in this example centers on export and another notes app, alongside the dollar amount.
- Several example posts ask whether annual billing changes. That question is absent from the stimulus.
Recommendations
- Pair the new price with the specific Pro change a reader can use.
- Say what happens to annual plans and to people already on Pro in the same announcement.
- Include export in the message you test, because leaving talk in this example goes through taking notes elsewhere.
Your message
Run the same shape of report on your own text
One simulation is $29: 500 simulated people, 20 rounds, 3 platforms. The Free tier is a smaller monthly allowance on the pricing page.